Structure of the Cosmos

Theologians have missed a number  of very obvious nuances to the writings of the Apostle John.  Whilst some of the material was encrypted within his writings, it was also sufficiently visible to have been understood.

John gave us a definition for the cosmos or logos. He identifies seven levels (dimensions) of existence  along with cross confirmations from within The Revelation Code. He begins this identification in the Gospel of John , confirms it in the Revelation Code, and then expands upon it.

7th Dimension - The Creator Father - Alpha and Omega , the beginning and the end, the first and the last.
6th  Dimension - The Word  aka The Word of God aka Almighty God aka Immanuel. Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending.
5th Dimension  - The Holy Spirit aka The Son of God aka Jesus. Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end.
4th Dimension - Those who live upon the sea (space).
3rd Dimension - Those who live under the sea. Alpha and Omega, the first and the last.
Second and First Dimensions - Those who live under the Earth.

It is of interest that seven through three inclusive are attached to a life force. The first of these, the one that enables all that follows beneath is the Creator Father. Inferred at the other end of the string is that there exists one and two dimensional 'forces' that are also alive. In local terms, this would suggest that  what we call subatomic particles are, in fact, 'life' and not 'things'. Each of these dimensions is 'anchored' to the life force that enables its existence.

John draws a distinction (dimensional reference)  between being on the sea and under it. Earth's current level of scientific awareness recognizes the existence of the fourth dimensions as 'time' or, more accurately, the absence of time whereas Earth and its inhabitants are subject to the dictates of linear time. The distinction therefore is between linear time and non linear time.

In The Revelation Code, John points to four individual having elevated status. As the sum of the parts can not exceed the whole, it is possible to easily identify the Creator Father. All of the Alpha and Omega declarations are contained within the totality of The Father. The two Son's of God, have similar albeit slightly different designations with the Planetary Prince (First and Last)  coming in fourth as a controlling element of The Earth.

The Apostle went to great pains to establish a protocol of status or ordering with multiple levels or redundant material providing confirmations and cross confirmations as to establish that the reader had, in fact, seen the material accurately without the need to 'interpret' his meaning.
This level of understanding is only possible when his writings are read in their decrypted form.

The Book of Revelation is seventy percent sealed (encrypted). The Gospels of John are twenty percent encrypted. It follows that the greater the level of encryption the lesser the possibility of an accurate understanding. Regardless, John was told to leave some material visible while, at the same time, hiding other information.

Roughly thirty percent of commonly held Christian beliefs spawn from John and many of his comments have been incorrectly 'interpreted'.

The Misidentification of The Trinity

Theologians teach that the Trinity is the Father, The Son and the Holy Ghost. By 'Son' they mean Jesus. This is erroneous and well establishes that the burden of two thousand years of incorrect interpretation has taken a poor toll. When one places their beliefs upon fact, that belief then becomes part and parcel of a reality system. When it is drawn from incorrect opinions (and an interpretation is nothing more than an opinion) you arrive at a belief system.  John's ordering of the Logos establishes what he 'really' said and not what which others presumed or assumed he meant.

The evidence of the ordering of the Trinity has been clearly visible in the writings of John for two millennia. However, continuing error based upon the assumption that a preexisting belief was correct precluded reexamination of that belief. The very first authors of error were the Apostles themselves and this gave birth to many inaccuracies. Consider this. Nowhere in the words of Jesus Himself do you find any evidence that He ever said 'Worship Me'. He always drew attention that Deity Worship should be directed towards The Father. It was the Apostles who taught that we should worship Jesus.

Now, from a worship perspective, this error is small. If one addresses any element of the Trinity - he is addressing all of them. 'These Three are One'.. However, from the vantage point of understanding the cosmos, and being totally unaware of John's precise systemization and identification, the interpretations built upon the assumptions first proffered by the Apostles have gone astray ever since. If the premise is wrong, all that flows from it is equally flawed.

Consider these verses from the Gospel of John

#1
Linkword = ONLY BEGOTTEN

JOH 1 14 AND THE WORD WAS MADE FLESH AND DWELT AMONG US (AND WE BEHELD HIS GLORY THE GLORY AS OF THE ONLY BEGOTTEN OF THE FATHER ) FULL OF GRACE AND TRUTH

JOH 1 18 NO MAN HATH SEEN GOD AT ANY TIME THE ONLY BEGOTTEN SON WHICH IS IN THE BOSOM OF THE FATHER HE HATH DECLARED HIM



#2

JOH 3 16 FOR GOD SO LOVED THE WORLD THAT HE GAVE HIS ONLY BEGOTTEN SON THAT WHOSOEVER BELIEVETH IN HIM SHOULD NOT PERISH BUT HAVE EVERLASTING LIFE


JOH 3 18 HE THAT BELIEVETH ON HIM IS NOT CONDEMNED BUT HE THAT BELIEVETH NOT IS CONDEMNED ALREADY BECAUSE HE HATH NOT BELIEVED IN THE NAME OF THE ONLY BEGOTTEN SON OF GOD


JO1 4 9 IN THIS WAS MANIFESTED THE LOVE OF GOD TOWARD US BECAUSE THAT GOD SENT HIS ONLY BEGOTTEN SON INTO THE WORLD THAT WE MIGHT LIVE THROUGH HIM




Great precision must be used in the reading of these verses. The Linkword 'Only Begotten' collects all of the relevant material into one place for examination. In the first ensemble we see that 'The Word' is  labeled as being the 'only begotten of the Father'. 'Only' clearly states that there is only 'one' with this relationship.

Further detailing on 'The Word' arrives in the very first line of the Gospel.

JOH 1 1 IN THE BEGINNING WAS THE WORD AND THE WORD WAS WITH GOD AND THE WORD WAS GOD

We now have a few factual items to work with.

1. The Word was with The Father at the very beginning.
2. The Word is the Only Begotten of The Father
3. The Word is in the bosom of The Father.
4. No Man has seen the Only Begotten Son, The Word (at any time)

Interpretations have taught that The Trinity is the Father, the Son (Jesus) and the Holy Ghost. They are unquestionably wrong and this fact is beyond contestation.

Jesus 'was seen' for the notable personage He is but The Word has not been seen. It follows that Jesus can not be 'The Word' and that Father, Jesus and The Holy Spirit is an incorrect identification for The Trinity.

The reader must be very careful not to get 'hooked' on the word 'God' for there are three Trinity elements who hold Deity Status and all three have the right to the term 'God'.

If The Word is the 'only begotten' of the The Father and the Word is not Jesus, by process of elimination Jesus is the Holy Spirit.  A cross confirmation of this arrives in the structure of the logos and the actual life of Jesus.  Jesus' kingdom begins at the fifth dimension. He rules all that is at 5d and below. Typically, we call this 'the universe'. Above Him is The Word who identifiable is the Creator of the Universe.

JOH 1:1  In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

JOH 1:2  The same was in the beginning with God.

JOH 1:3  All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.


The Word's role as Creator  is clearly  visible and stated.  It follows, again, that as Jesus can not be The Word and that He also is not the Creator of the Cosmos. Instead, he rules the universe that was created for  Him.

During the Last Supper, the Holy Spirit was called down upon the Apostles 'by' Jesus. He did so and 'could' do so for only one reason. It is His to command. No where in the writings of John do we see a situation where The Word commands or controls The Holy Spirit. The only visible evidence directly links this to Jesus and only to Jesus. It should be noted that, as a matter of logic, what it ain't is frequently as important as what it is.

The correct ordering for The Trinity is the same as is seen in John's structuring of the Cosmos. The first three elements are the Creator Father, The Word and Jesus in this order.

Viewing ensemble #2, we have versing that addresses only Jesus. Noteworthy is that nowhere do we see mention of The Father. As Jesus can not be The Word, it follows that hey can not be the only begotten 'of' The Father. Regardless, He is tagged as being the Only Begotten Son of God. At issue is 'which God'? By process of elimination Jesus is the Son of The Word and not The Father and 'The Word' has been clearly labeled as being 'God'. Ergo, Jesus 'is' the Son of God (The Word).

Ancient cultures, in an attempt to explain natural phenomena, 'believed' that gods controlled the seasons and natural events.
Theologians have done something similar with their construct of The Trinity. They paint a picture wherein you have one body and three heads sharing it instead of collating the obvious evidence and arriving at a different arrangement, three unique people sharing one spirit - The Spirit of the Creator Father.

Consider the bestowal of the Holy Spirit upon the Apostles. Peter received this on a Thursday and not long afterwards was out denying the Christ thrice. The receipt of the spirit did not elevate his courage, nor did it make him infallible or all powerful.
He remained the person that he was. So also it is with the Trinity. Three distinct people joined by one spirit. The Apostles joined with Jesus (The Holy Spirit) for a common purpose and a common service. So too is the Trinity so joined but none have given up their unique personalities or individuality in the doing.


Apostolic Error


As has already been noted, the Apostles were not immune from error. Matthew's comment that Jesus 'must have been' the fulfillment of Isaiah's prophecy of the birth of Immanuel by virgin birth  is , at best, a speculation. In truth, no one has ever seen Immanuel and the evidence does not support Matthew's opinion beyond his assumption that as Jesus arrived by virgin birth he 'had to be it'. Following Matthew's poor logic, theologians 'assume' that the word Immanuel is also another name for Jesus in that the word means 'God is with us'. They've neglected to ask the pertinent question 'Which God'?

The naming convention delivered to Mary for Jesus was set by the Archangel Gabriel. Jesus does not equate in any way shape or form to Immanuel. Isaiah tells us that Immanuel would have a privileged life (would eat of butter and honey) whereas Jesus and his parents were working class. There is no evidence that Matthew or the other Apostles ever met Immanuel or were even were privy to third hand hearsay about him. Aside from Isaiah's comments there is no evidence whatsoever that He even existed.
However, let us not be quick too dismiss Isaiah for, in truth, he did have it right.
JOH 1 14 AND THE WORD WAS MADE FLESH AND DWELT AMONG US (AND WE BEHELD HIS GLORY THE GLORY AS OF THE ONLY BEGOTTEN OF THE FATHER ) FULL OF GRACE AND TRUTH
We do know that 'The Word' has incarnated as a man and is living upon the Earth. As Jesus, the Son of Immanuel, came into life by virtue of virgin birth, it follows that his elder (also a Son of God) would do so as well. This paints a portrait of two virgin births, not one, and is consistent with the ancillary evidence and verses supplied to us by the Apostle John.

In discussions with a qualified theologian it has been noted that every time there is a divergence between The Revelation Code and common Christian belief, the disparity always tracks back to an interpretation (opinion) and not to an established fact.

In common religious practice this matters only a little. Jesus holds Deity status and is a God element of the Trinity. It is noteworthy that this information was intended to be known 'only' at the End of Days. The logic and purpose of it becomes clear when the War in Heaven arrives on stage. It was sufficient that Christian see 'enough' but not all. There was no expectation of perfection within the confines of mankind.